Virtual & fractional CISO
Accountable security leadership on a monthly retainer, sized to what your business actually needs.
- Board and investor reporting
- Risk ownership and roadmap
- Customer assurance and audits
Virtual & fractional CISO
Building product first is the right call. The catch is that the early decisions your engineering and IT teams make quietly shape how agile, resilient and certifiable the business will be later. Bring the security voice into the room early, and those same decisions start accelerating your growth rather than constraining your next audit, investor review or enterprise deal.
Why security gets expensive later
The problem is what happens next.
The decisions your IT function makes in its first two years quietly determine what your first certification will cost and how long your first enterprise security review will take.
How identity is architected. How devices and access are provisioned, and revoked. Which suppliers touch customer data, and what was actually agreed with them. What gets logged, and for how long.
None of these are security decisions when they are made. They only become security decisions later, when somebody asks for evidence.
Three decisions we see again and again. All sensible at the time. All made by competent people.
Found out laterEquivalent protection was already included in licensing it owned, alongside two controls it had been separately quoted to buy.
Found out laterThe detection features it was paying for had never been switched on, leaving it blind to targeted intrusion.
Found out laterCustomer data had been pasted into tools nobody had assessed, under terms nobody had read, and there was no record of what had gone where.
There was never a moment when this business chose to defer security. There was simply no one in the room translating its operational decisions into assurance consequences. That translation is the whole of what we do.
Case study
A UK multi-site consumer business asked a procurement question: should we renew our endpoint security subscription? The answer took ten minutes. What surfaced while checking took the rest of the engagement.
A premium subscription paid annually, while equivalent protection sat unused inside enterprise licensing the business already owned, alongside privileged access controls and data loss prevention it had been separately quoted to buy.
The product it was already paying for ran with only basic anti-virus enabled. The features that detect a genuine intruder were licensed, paid for, and disabled. No decision, no risk acceptance, just a default nobody revisited.
Competent IT. A working estate. And still a gap, because nobody owned the translation between what operations does and what assurance requires. The findings went to the board as a four-page pre-read.
Two ordinary operational decisions, made competently, for sensible reasons. Both had assurance consequences nobody was tracking. One saved money once found, the other cost nothing to fix.
The engagement arc
Most engagements start small and deliberately. We land on a fixed-fee piece of work with a board-visible output, then take ownership of what it recommends.
Two to three weeks, fixed fee. We map your estate, suppliers and configuration against what the business has committed to over the next eighteen months: the customers you intend to win, the round you intend to raise, the renewal you need to pass, the certification somebody is already asking for.
A named, costed set of gaps in the order they should be closed, with the exposure quantified. Written for a board, not for engineers.
We take accountability for delivery: your risk register, your policy set, your auditor and customer conversations, your board reporting.
Deals unblocked, questionnaires answered in days rather than weeks, certification achieved and maintained, diligence survived without a scramble.
An IT and Assurance Alignment Review. Two to three weeks, fixed fee, delivered as a board-ready paper. Most clients move to a retainer at the end of it, because the roadmap needs an owner.
Governance · Risk · Assurance
Every engagement is a named, scoped piece of work with defined deliverables. No open-ended consulting, no day-rate drift.
Accountable security leadership on a monthly retainer, sized to what your business actually needs.
The function itself: frameworks, registers, policy architecture and the evidence to back them.
Certification treated as a commercial deadline, because that is usually what it is.
Your suppliers hold your data and your obligations. Most assurance programmes cannot prove it.
Your people are already using AI. The question is whether you can say which tools, on what data, under whose terms, and who approved it. Customers are starting to ask that question in the same breath as everything else, and the answer is becoming a condition of the deal well before it becomes a condition of any certificate.
Retainers
Retainers are sized by monthly days, not by headcount you are replacing. Projects are scoped and quoted individually.
Board-level security leadership, without the full-time hire. A named, accountable security leader on a monthly retainer, sized by the days your business actually needs, not a permanent headcount you are not ready to carry.
See the full tier comparison and service descriptions
The tiers above serve as baseline models for typical maturity stages. Deliverables, day allocations, and focus areas are fully tailored to your operational requirements identified during our initial alignment call—ensuring you only pay for the exact security leadership your business needs.
About Annansec
Annansec exists because the organisations that most need security leadership are usually the ones least able to justify a full-time hire. They are growing quickly, selling into buyers who ask hard questions, and running on a technology estate assembled faster than it was governed.
We are deliberately small. That is the point: you get the person who did the work, not a team assembled around a proposal.
Start here
Tell us what is blocked, who is asking, and when they need an answer. If we are not the right people, we will say so and point you to who is.
Conversations are confidential. We do not need your data to have the first one.